{Stuff}
Review of Stories of struggles and breaking through adversity are ones in which even failures can be powerfully moving. Heroes and their legacy are the stories that inspire and encourage us the most. The Wreck of the River of Stars is not one of those inspiring stories. The back cover slogan of “Tragedy in Space” would certainly apply if we sent the book there. The reviews found on the internet relating to this book are strangely divided between those strongly affirming of the book and those strongly disparaging. This review was written before any of those other ones were read but would be an example of the latter. The book is really a train wreck. It is, in a word, awful. Michael Flynn may be a winner of the Heinlein award for some other writing but all this proves is that the books to buy are actually the ones by the original sci-fi legends like Heinlein, Asimov, Dickson, Pournelle, Niven, and Clark. There are few redeeming qualities in the book and my review is thus forced to simply list the problems. Some of these could be spoilers. Sci-fi Language Sci-fi Plot Holes Second, a repeated problem is not knowing exactly where the ship is. This is as silly as saying you know the location of the moon but don’t know where the Earth that you’re standing on is. Determining exact location is not a problem with so many planets visible that bearings can be taken from. Third, the space radar is said to only work for things “in close range” but in space there is nothing like air or mountains to hinder the “range” of radar signals. They keep going until they bounce off something. In a related issue, the space radar apparently drains so much energy that the fusion motors, superconducting coils, and entire ship’s power systems are drained by simply sending a single “long range” ping. The combination of surprisingly plentiful space junk and dodgy radar seems too much of a plot contrivance than realistic science. Sex Ethical Absence Action, or Not Drug Use In Conclusion |
Home -- About Us -- Links -- Site History